| |
|
Feature:
Wednesday June 1 2005
|
|
|
EMPLOYERS ARE WRONG
ABOUT 48-HOUR WEEK TUC demolishes myths
|
A TUC briefing paper published Monday slams employer
myths and silences about long hours working.
The TUC says: This briefing demolishes the myths that
are being peddled by the employers organisations about the
effect of the 48 hour week on health and safety, worker choice
and business success.
It also examines the areas where the employers have
maintained a pointed silence, looking at the detrimental effect
of long hours on women, families and lifelong learning.
Myth 1 Long hours are not a health and safety
issue.
In 1996 the then Conservative Government took a court
case against the European Commission on this point.
They were badly beaten since all the evidence points the same
way. Since then the evidence of health risks has continued
to pile up, including reports by the UK Health and Safety
Executive (2002), the International Labour Organisation (2003),
the UK Department of Trade and Industry (2003) and the US
Governments National Institute of Occupational Safety
and Health (2004).
The evidence indicates that those who regularly work
more than about 48 hours per week are likely to suffer an
increased risk of heart disease, stress related illness, mental
illness, diabetes and bowel problems.
They are also likely to drink and smoke more, and to
adopt a poor diet.
There are also concerns about the exposure risk to chemicals
and noise for long hours workers, as the safe limits are always
based on a 40-hour working week.
Myth 2 the UK has a good health and safety record,
so there is no need to worry about long hours and overwork.
Those who make this point always refer to the accident
statistics in EU countries. It is worth noting that the evidence
of harm is mostly about the detrimental health effects of
long hours rather than accident rates.
Furthermore, when evaluating the effects of long hours
it is misleading to simply compare international rates for
all workers.
We are concerned with the 14 per cent of UK employees
who work more than 48 hours per week, not with part time workers
and those who work 40 hours per week.
Once the focus is firmly on long hours workers, there
is abundant evidence that long hours have an impact on their
health see myth 1.
Myth 3 All those who work long hours are happy
to do so.
Every study of the opt-outs in the UK has identified significant
abuse by employers. The evidence includes reports by the European
Commission (2003) and the Department of Trade and Industry
2001, 2003 and 2004.
The most recent DTI report found that:
58 per cent of long hours workers said that they would
be happy for their employer to limit them to 48 hours per
week. (ONS data suggest that this figure might actually be
as high as 68 per cent).
42 per cent simply had all their working time fixed
by their employer.
only 34 per cent had signed an opt-out, despite a legal
requirement for most long hours workers to do so.
66 per cent had not signed an opt-out. One quarter of
this group (600,000) said that they were pressured to work
long hours by their employer.
The TUCs know your rights line has identified
a range of abuse ranging from bureaucratic and office
culture pressure and to plain old fashioned bullying.
Myth 4 Employers are willing to tackle any
cases of abuse of the current regulations.
Employers have had six and half years to deal with abuse,
but most have shown little inclination to put their house
in order.
Myth 5 Trade unions are trying to make a rule
that workers dont want. Employers are simply defending
a workers right to work long hours.
Given their record of opposing employment rights, employers
organisations rather lack credibility as workers champions.
The truth is that most long hours workers want to work
fewer hours, and that their employers pressure many into signing
away their rights.
Even if that were not the case, it would still not be
right for workers to be allowed to opt-out of health and safety
limits, otherwise the law would be undermined and workers
left at risk.
An employees right to work long hours is limited
by their duty to work safely. This is not just for their own
sakes but also for the sake of colleagues and passers-by that
might be harmed by dangerous work practices, so health and
safety law must always be upheld.
The employers like to assert that they are supporting
their workers right to work unlimited overtime. This
assertion needs to be examined closely.
The most important point is that six out of ten (2.2
million) long hours workers do not receive any extra pay for
the extra hours that they put in, and that unpaid hours are
increasing while paid overtime is declining.
Of the 1.4 million long hours workers who are paid overtime,
1.0 million say that they would like to reduce their hours.
The TUC unions are achieving notable successes in their
work to end excessive working hours whilst maintaining earnings.
The TUC also wants workers to have more freedom of choice
over hours and patterns of work within safe limits.
That is why we support the extension of the legal right
to request flexible working. Predictably, the CBI opposes
even this basic measure to extend freedom of choice.
Myth 6 The UK economy needs long hours to
succeed.
The truth is that long hours actually impede productivity.
Long hours workers become fatigued, which leads to lower output
per hour, a decline in the quality of work and more mistakes.
The UK already works the longest hours in EU-15, but
we are only 10th out of 15 in terms of productivity per hour.
We need investment, training and better work organisation,
not more hours.
Since the Working Time Directive was applied to the
UK, average working time has fallen slightly.
Rather than this proving to be a problem, business has
continued to thrive and the number of people in employment
has risen by 1.5 million.
Myth 7 Small businesses rely on long hours to
succeed.
In reality most small businesses do not rely on long hours.
Furthermore, although more than a third of UK employees work
in small businesses with less than 24 workers, small businesses
take more than eight per cent less than their share of long
hours workers.
In contrast, medium sized businesses with 50-499 employees
are most likely to rely on long hours, taking nearly six per
cent more than their share of those workers who exceed 48
hours per week.
Myth 8 globalisation means that we must work
more hours.
Our competitive advantage is in high road
businesses, in other words, in working smart. Relying on long
hours is usually a sign that the business is not very smart;
wherever in the world it is located.
Despite this fact, we are sometimes exhorted to work
more hours by organisations that have a strong free market
agenda, such as the International Monetary fund.
This prescription is a dangerous misdiagnosis of what
is needed for a successful economy.
Some people say that we should copy the working practices
found in the USA. Before we take any lessons on how to deal
with globalisation we should note that the US has a large
external trade deficit, whilst the EU has a surplus.
On working time, average hours are falling in the USA.
The US achieves high productivity because it has a high level
of investment per head, a high proportion of graduate workers,
and a very large domestic market. It succeeds to a large degree
despite its long hours culture rather than because of it.
Pointed Silence 1 long hours workplaces are excluding
women.
Only one in five (19.8 per cent) of long hours workers
are female.
Furthermore, the position is even worse in the better
jobs. Only 15 per cent of long hours managers and three
per cent of skilled manual workers are female.
These figures are striking. The explanation is that
there is still a widespread expectation that women will bear
the brunt of childcare and domestic work. Unsurprisingly,
they are then less willing or able to work long hours.
The TUCs view is simply that any employer that
demands excessive hours automatically discriminates against
women by reinforcing the glass ceiling and gender segregation.
Pointed Silence 2 The families of long hours
workers suffer.
The detrimental effect of long hours on parenting causes
the TUC considerable concern.
Pointed Silence 3 Long hours workers are squeezed
out of lifelong learning.
Those who work more than 48 hours per week have little
time left for education and training. If this problem is not
addressed then it is likely to set up a vicious circle of
underinvestment and low skills perpetuating the use of long
hours.
On Thursday 2 June the TUC will publish new evidence that
confirms that long hours are a barrier to training and education.
The TUC strongly supports the Governments initiatives
to promote lifelong learning. The principle of joined-up
government demands that action must be taken to end
long hours.
|