 |
SOME of the readers of the
Morning Star, the daily paper of the Communist
Party, will have got a nasty shock when they read
in the issue of Monday 11th October, the statement
of the Stop the War Coalition (StWC) condemning
the activities of the leaders of the Iraqi Federation
of Trade Unions (IFTU).
In particular, the statement condemned the activities
of their British representative Abdullah Muhsin.
He played a critical and counter-revolutionary
role at the Labour Party conference in getting
leaders of the major trade unions to break their
mandate and vote against the resolution calling
for the date to be named for the start of the
withdrawal of British troops from Iraq.
The statement insists that the StWC has
consistently called for the withdrawal of foreign
troops and the ending of the occupation.
It adds: This position commands the support
of the great majority of the British people and
was reaffirmed recently as the unanimous position
of the TUC.
It also commands the support of the majority
of the Iraqi people, as evidenced by opinion polling
carried out by the occupation forces themselves.
The StWC names the three issues that decided it
to condemn the IFTU.
It states that Muhsin: Urged that the Labour
Party conference welcome the puppet Iraqi premier
Allawi, at a time when the entire anti-war movement
was demanding that the invitation be withdrawn,
which it subsequently was.
Shared a platform with Foreign Secretary
Jack Straw and the governments human
rights envoy to Iraq Ann Clwyd, respectively
a leading architect of, and an indefatigable apologist
for, the war and the occupation.
Most shamefully of all, energetically lobbied
the trade union affiliates of the Labour Party
to oppose a motion, reflecting the unions
own agreed policies, calling on Blair to set an
early date for the withdrawal of British troops
from Iraq.
The StWC statement added: In their last
undertaking, the IFTU representative worked as
the direct instrument of the government and the
Labour Party apparatus, which prepared and distributed
his statements to delegates and ensured him access
to union delegations.
Indeed, the statement by the IFTU representative
issued by the party was not merely supportive
of the continued military occupation of his country,
but could also be read as supportive of the original
invasion of Iraq.
The statement added that the IFTU attempted
to divide the anti-war movement from the trade
unions.
The statement concluded: With regard to
the IFTU, the StWC condemns its political collaboration
with the British government, exemplified at the
Labour Party conference, and its view that genuinely
independent trade unionism in Iraq can develop
under a regime of military occupation including
the daily bombardment of major Iraqi cities
by the US and Britain.
The fact of the matter is that the IFTU did not
develop these traits overnight. Its leaders supported
the war from its beginning, they returned to Iraq
in the baggage trains of the imperialist armies
and formed the IFTU which now supports indefinite
occupation, (or until Allawi asks for it to be
ended the same thing as indefinite occupation).
Part of the shock for Morning Star readers is
that the CP and the Morning Star have acted as
the most enthusiastic cheer-leaders for the IFTU
ever since the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Some of its readers will have noted that the Morning
Star did not condemn Abdullah Muhsin, the British
representative of the IFTU, or the IFTU itself.
It limited itself to printing the StWC statement,
and then giving Muhsin the right to reply
to George Galloway MPs attack on his politics,
the next day.
Galloway scathingly described Muhsin as a trade
unionist of 18 months and a former
pillar of the Iraqi Communist Party who
is now masquerading as a spokesman of the
working class of Iraq.
He added about Muhsins presence at the conference
that The state brought along its very own
Iraqi Quisling.
Once again, the Morning Star or the Communist
Party did not put out its own statement on any
if this dynamite political material.
Both the CP and the Morning Star are hoping that,
given time, the fury over the IFTU stab in the
back at the Labour Party conference will die down,
sooner rather than later, and that then it will
be possible to resume treachery as usual.
The Stalinists are going to be disappointed. The
anger over the sell-out by the trade union leaders
at the LP conference is, in fact, increasing by
the day.
On Friday at the European Forum Conference, the
leader of the IFTU, Subji al Mashadani, was prevented
from speaking by angry workers and youth and had
to leave the meeting.
The TUC leaders could not prevent this from happening
and commented later: The TUC is dismayed
at this mornings events that saw a small
minority of participants heckling and jostling
the leader of the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions,
Subji al Mashadani, forcing him to leave the session.
We condemn the attempts of a few to prevent
the views of Iraqi trade unionists from being
heard. We call on everyone at the European Social
Forum to support the decision of the organisers
to allow Subji to speak tonight as originally
planned.
The TUC believes that the voice of Iraqi
trade unions should be heard. The IFTU is one
of several trade union voices in Iraq and the
TUC is of the view that all of them should be
listened to if we are to help the Iraqi people
to rebuild their country.
Our Congress reiterated our view that the
war was wrong and that troops should be withdrawn
as soon as possible. The only way forward is to
allow people of differing opinions to have their
say.
Anger is growing at the role of the leaders of
the major British trade unions at the Labour Party
conference, not just the leaders of the IFTU.
The Morning Star is caught in the contradiction
between the millions who oppose the war and the
occupation, and the trade union bureaucracy which
is willing to sell out anything and everything
to make a deal with Prime Minister Blair.
The Stalinists are going to be destroyed by this
contradiction.
At one time, the Morning Star was the mouthpiece
of the Stalinist bureaucracy in the Kremlin.
But after Gorbachev, and then Yeltsin, undermined
and then declared the end of the USSR, they seamlessly
switched their support to the British trade union
bureaucracy, who are now financially supporting
the newspaper and getting its political support
in return.
At the Labour Party conference, this TU bureaucracy
shamelessly sold out to Blair over Iraq, with
Muhsin and the IFTU as the facilitator.
The Stalinists, who have a number of prominent
leaders in the StWC, could not just dismiss the
massive anger of the millions who support the
anti-war movement they had to print the
Stop the War statement, while taking care not
to support the statement editorially since that
would cook their goose with the trade union bureaucracy.
In fact, the Stalinists have been to the right
of the TUC on the question of the Iraqi trade
unions.
In their statement about the welcome that the
IFTU was given at the European Social Forum, the
TUC said: The TUC believes that the voice
of Iraqi trade unions should be heard. The IFTU
is one of several trade union voices in Iraq and
the TUC is of the view that all of them should
be listened to if we are to help the Iraqi people
to rebuild their country.
The position of the Communist Party and the Morning
Star since the invasion of Iraq has been to support
the IFTU, and to condemn unions such as the GFTU
(General Federation of Trade Unions in Iraq) which
they call a yellow trade union, but
which recognises the right of the Iraqi people
to fight the occupation armies and their puppets
in the current insurgency.
The CP and the Morning Star enthusiastically supported
the comradely relationship that the IFTU established
with the Iraqi Governing Council, which was selected
by US occupation chief Paul Bremer, and then with
the interim government, which was
also selected by Bremer.
There are Iraqi Communist Party members in the
leadership of the IFTU, and Iraqi Stalinists sat
in the Iraqi Governing Council, and sit in the
interim government.
For its services to imperialism the IFTU has been
legally declared the official trade union of Iraq.
The IFTU is in fact the real yellow trade
union, sponsored by the yellow politics
of the CP and Morning Star, as the StWC and the
British workers have just discovered to their
cost.
Continued tomorrow
|
 |