 |
IN ITS STATEMENT on the Iraqi
Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU) treachery at
the Labour Party Conference, where its British
representative, Abdullah Muhsin, was used by Blair
and Straw to persuade the trade union bureaucracy
to vote for the indefinite occupation of Iraq,
the StWC made the following point about its attitude
to the occupation of Iraq.
The StWC reaffirms its call for an end to
the occupation, the return of all British troops
in Iraq to this country and recognises once more
the legitimacy of the struggle of the Iraqi people
to secure such ends.
The StWC is correct to confirm the legitimacy
of the struggle of the Iraqi people to secure
the withdrawal of troops and the end of the occupation.
However the movement to stop the war has to go
further than this.
It has to support the struggle of the occupied
people of Iraq to defeat the imperialist forces
and to drive them out of the country, by working
to mobilise the working class at home, in the
trade unions, to bring down the imperialist aggressor
government, and to replace it with a workers
government.
This is the way forward to defeat capitalism and
imperialism.
As the StWC statement recognises, the role of
Muhsin and IFTU at the Labour Party conference
was that they attempted to divide the anti-war
movement from the trade unions, thus acting
as an open conscious agency of imperialism.
To do that Muhsin mobilised the cowardly trade
union bureaucracy, which was willing to sell out
the Iraqi people for the promise of a few minor
concessions from the government.
The same trade union bureaucracy will betray the
struggle of British workers at the first serious
test.
A serious struggle to stop the imperialist war
on Iraq means uniting the insurgent Iraqi people
with the British trade unions to smash imperialism.
This means removing and replacing the trade union
bureaucracy with leaders who will fight, and defeating
the politics of the counter-revolutionary Stalinists.
The Workers Revolutionary Party and the News Line
supports unconditionally the struggle of the oppressed
nations against imperialism.
Regardless of who is leading that struggle we
are for the defeat of the imperialist powers.
Our attitude to the national bourgeoisie of the
oppressed nations is that when it fights imperialism
we will give it support, but where it forms a
bloc with imperialism we will oppose it.
Basing ourselves on this position, when Saddam
Hussein attacked Iran in 1979 and was armed with
wmds by the imperialist powers for this purpose,
we supported Iran.
This meant that we were practically alone when
the News Line condemned the use of gas against
the Kurdish people at Halabja.
The Western bourgeois media was silent since it
supported Saddam, while the US, UK and France
had supplied Saddam with the weaponry that he
required for use against both the Iranians and
the Kurds.
The position changed with the first Gulf War of
1991, when the US organised a 30 state attack
on Iraq, attempted to bomb it back into the 19th
century, and imposed UN sanctions which cost the
lives of 1.5 million Iraqis, including half a
million children under five.
We were for the victory of Iraq in the 1991 war
and opposed the sanctions.
Their purpose was to try and create a situation
where the Iraqi people would rise up and overthrow
the Iraqi government.
They never succeeded in doing this, but when the
US Secretary of State of the day Madeleine Albright
was questioned about the 1.5 million deaths due
to sanctions, she replied that these deaths were
a price worth paying to get rid of
Saddam.
Consequently, we sought to make links with the
Iraqi trade union body, the GFTU to campaign for
the lifting of sanctions.
In 2001 our members in the FBU were able to convince
that union to send an official delegation to the
GFTUs May Day celebrations, to bring the
solidarity of firefighters to the sanction stricken
Iraqi people.
In 2002 a delegation from the GFTU was invited
to the FBU conference.
The delegation was received with enthusiasm and
as a result of their visit the conference at Bridlington,
on Thursday May 16th, passed the following resolution,
with just four votes against.
Conference condemns the continuing war and
sanctions against Iraq and believes that Americas
recent proposals to consider the use of tactical
nuclear weapons against various countries including
Iraq is symptomatic of imperialist aggression
which must be halted.
The Conference therefore calls on the TUC
to send a delegation to visit the General Federation
of Trade Unions (Iraq) in Baghdad with a view
to building fraternal relations between Iraqi
and British trade unionists.
This would be the first step towards ending
all hostilities between our two countries.
This resolution, which sought to bring the Iraqi
people and the British trade unions together was
unfortunately never acted on.
The following March 2003 Iraq was invaded by the
US-UK imperialists, who brought back with them
to Iraq gangs of counter-revolutionaries, many
of them from the Iraqi Communist Party.
The official position of the TUC and the Morning
Star was that the war in Iraq was illegal.
However that did not stop the Stalinists supporting
the Iraqi Governing Council that the US occupation
Chief, Bremer established.
Muhsin organised a trip to Iraq by a group of
British trade unionists, who were cheered on by
the Morning Star and the Communist party.
They called the GFTU a yellow trade union,
and reported that the returning emigres
many of whom had spent 30 years in England
had occupied the offices of the GFTU and were
demanding that the occupation authorities hand
over the GFTUs funds to them.
The delegation of British trade unionists went
along to see the head of the stooge Governing
Council, Iyad Allawi (the current puppet prime
minister) and asked him to hand over the funds
of the Baathist trade unions
to the new allegedly democratic unions that were
to be formed as a result of the US-UK invasion.
In the meeting with Allawi, Alex Gordon of the
RMT demanded: When will the IIGC call for
the unfreezing of the former Baathist trade
unions funds to rebuild democratic trade
unions in Iraq?
The US stooge Governing Council issued Occupation
decree number 16 signed by Interim Governing Council
President Adnan Pachachi on January 28, 2004 declaring
that the IFTU was the legitimate and legal
representatives of the labour movement in Iraq,
therefore illegalising the General Federation
of Trade Unions in Iraq.
IFTU is a creature of the occupation, and the
imperialist powers.
When the News Line invited leaders of the GFTU
to visit Britain last November, the StWC refused
to meet them on the grounds they were Baathists
and supported the right of the masses to fight
the occupation.
This was due, no doubt, to the pro-imperialist
influence of the Communist Party and the Morning
Star.
We are pleased that the StWC now recognises the
right of the masses to fight the occupiers.
The TUC also refused to meet them, but explained
that it was to attend an international trade union
conference to discuss the Iraqi trade unions.
As a result of pressure from the world trade union
movement, the TUC decided that trade unions could
not be exported to the Arab world along with US
and UK armies, and that all trade unions in Iraq
would have to be respected.
This made no difference to the CP and the Morning
Star.
They have campaigned to get a number of trade
unions to support IFTU and unknowingly, perhaps,
through that, to give support to the stooge interim
government of Iraq and the occupation of that
country.
The pay off for this Stalinist toadying to the
imperialists in Iraq was that Muhsin was put into
position to be able to deliver the knife into
the back of the anti-war movement, on behalf of
Blair and Straw at the Labour Party conference.
Not only must trade unions end any support for
IFTU and the occupation of Iraq, they must remove
all those union leaders who agreed to sell out
the Iraqi people at the Labour Party conference
and used their members bloc vote to support
the indefinite occupation of that country.
In fact, all trade unionists and opponents of
the war in Iraq who want to see united action
established between the workers of the west and
the oppressed nations to smash capitalism and
imperialism should join the WRP.
The WRP is the British section of the International
Committee of the Fourth International, the world
party of the socialist revolution.
Concluded
|
 |